|
Post by garrison on Jun 3, 2024 13:25:43 GMT
I found the Intro to Existential America reading to be very interesting. Of course I have heard of existentialism along with names like Sarte and Beauvoir, but i can't say I have ever had an understanding of it. Our "absurd condition" seemed to pop up a decent amount. I can see how our not so simple existense could cause this level of philosophical thought. The reading mentioned an attemept to define existentialism by Sarte where he said we are "condemmed to be free." In reading this, I realized that I have struggled with existential ideas without ever really knowing it. I'm sure that could be said for us with a lot of different philosophies, but it is kind of an eye opener.
|
|
|
Post by gnicholson3 on Jun 3, 2024 16:49:36 GMT
The idea of the condemnation of being free wasn't necessarily a new concept for me, but I've only heard of it in a positive sense unlike how I feel the text delivered the idea. I've heard of it in the biblical sense of humanity's reception of free-will, but this feels a little more aloof and intangible. I have also had existential thoughts and I often find myself finding the "me" in literature and philosophy and I think most people who read often do. This feels very in line with a quote from our reading, "all individuals, ultimately, were responsible for what they made of themselves" (4). We seek ourselves because we are aware of ourselves.
|
|