|
Post by Dr. Nemmers on Jun 7, 2024 2:39:31 GMT
So, this novel is about a character who is trying to write a novel. (He's very much failing so far). To me, this calls for some critical attention, as Norman Mailer was certainly very aware of this intersecting plot line while he himself was trying to write Barbary Shore. Here's three different terms that have to do with a situation like this. Which do you think applies-- and how does that help us understand the novel we're reading? Metafiction: a form of fiction that emphasizes its own narrative structure in a way that inherently reminds the audience that they are reading or viewing a fictional work. Metafiction is self-conscious about language, literary form, and story-telling, and works of metafiction directly or indirectly draw attention to their status as artifacts. Metafiction is frequently used as a form of parody or a tool to undermine literary conventions and explore the relationship between literature and reality, life, and art. Kunstlerroman: (German: “artist’s novel”), class of Bildungsroman, or apprenticeship novel, that deals with the youth and development of an individual who becomes—or is on the threshold of becoming—a painter, musician, or poet Poioumenon: A specific type of metafiction in which the story is about the process of creation (sometimes the creation of the story itself). en.wiktionary.org/wiki/poioumenon
|
|
|
Post by mjunious on Jun 8, 2024 6:55:48 GMT
Thus far, Barbary Shore does not seem to fit the metafiction very well, as it is not very self aware and generally lacks any sort of mise en abyme. To contrast, the experience of reading a book like House of Leaves (to use an extreme example) is equally reliant on the literary creation as is the story told within the work. Kunstlerroman might be more applicable because it does seem to be about his development as an author; his process, or thwarting thereof, by, mostly, his relationships with the people in the building. As his sophomore novel, and not having found much commercial success at this point in his career, Mailer might be using this as a cathartic escape from his own frustrations as a writer. It might be a reflection of the challenges I face when trying to finish my own works, but as a reader, I find myself wanting Mike Lovett to not only stay faithful to his routine in order to finish his novel, but also trying to find some sort of genuine interpersonal camaraderie with one of the other inhabitants of the building.
|
|
|
Post by reluedders on Jun 9, 2024 0:06:32 GMT
Hmmmm... I'm going to go with Poioumenon (I have no idea how to pronounce it, by the way!).
Is it some sort of extended metaphor about Lovett creating his story (because his has essentially been erased), which he is creating a physical story, his novel? I don't know if I'm going to far with it or not. We are viewing the process in which he is creating himself, through he people he meets, things he does, all while trying to write his actual novel.
I may be waaaaaaay off base, but that's what popped into my head for some reason.
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Nemmers on Jun 9, 2024 3:22:13 GMT
Interesting responses! Mitchell, some great stuff here, and a new literary term for me, mise en abyme. I love it when I learn from my students... very astute analysis overall. Agree that this effort may be quite personal autobiographical for Norman Mailer, let's keep tracing that.
I think I"m wondering the same as you, Renee-- is the novel that we're reading the same novel that Mikey is writing? That is, is he just recording what happens to him as a way to ward off writer's block?
I just read another American existentialist novel, The Dangling Man by Saul Bellow, and it's composed in the form of a series of diary entries, which is self-referentially showing us that we are reading what the protagonist is writing.
What would that mean if we are reading the novel itself?
|
|
|
Post by reluedders on Jun 10, 2024 14:55:32 GMT
I guess that would make sense, especially from what I was thinking about how the other characters, outside of Lovett, are being shown. There's so much detail with them, and hardly any detail around Lovett himself. A lot of what we see of him are things that he's thinking about the other characters an their actions, so this would make sense that we are experiencing a type of Lovett journal.
|
|