|
Post by mjunious on Jul 28, 2024 0:02:24 GMT
"In January 1944, having finished my documentary sketches of camp life, I finally decided to leave." -Citizen 13660, pg 206
It may be because I have limited knowledge of this event, but this passage struck me as quite odd. I do not understand how Okubo could just "decide" to leave so nonchalantly. On the other hand, if she did have the choice to leave the entire time, it would add a level of profoundness that she would choose to stay and document the camp. Was the documentation used as a means of coping, or did she feel a sense of purpose to document history? Or was her "[deciding] to leave" a cheeky statement that I did not catch on to? The back cover synopsis uses the word "witty" to describe the text, but I think that wit may have gone over my head as well. Did anyone feel differently?
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Nemmers on Jul 28, 2024 23:07:56 GMT
So, I think what she's referring to here is her opportunity to leave camp to take up a job in civilian society-- this was a program that was brought about much later in the "internment." The text mentions that the Japanese could take jobs in factories, or in different occupations as long as they applied and had been properly vetted. I think that's the straightforward answer here.
But it also does seem that she chose to remain longer than she had to in order to complete her "sketches." That's interesting to me, and really undercuts any notion that the camps were *that* awful. Or does it?
|
|
|
Post by reluedders on Jul 29, 2024 0:14:44 GMT
I think Okubo could have had several reasons for staying longer and "deciding" to leave when she did. It mentions many times that after being in the internment camps, many of the people had no where to go, just as many Jews did over in Europe. Even though the camps weren't ideal, it was a place to live & gave some security. Maybe that was a reason?
Or, maybe she had just outgrown the idea of drawing and documenting what went on and felt she had to let go & move on with her life? I'm not saying that what she went through wasn't a big deal, but perhaps she felt she had to let it go and move forward?
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by mjunious on Jul 31, 2024 0:45:51 GMT
I think that makes more sense. She may have, to a certain extent, accepted life in the camp, and the security is something I did not consider: with public opinion probably changing in light of the war, Pearl Harbor, etc., it might have actually been more secure, albeit not enjoyable at all. This is definitely an event that I wish would have been taught more, but I would like to delve a little deeper into learning about.
|
|